Download Sawmill 8.6.1
30 Days Free Trial


	Support \| Forum \| Documentation \| Consulting \| Feedback

SAWMILLFORUM

Sawmill Discussion Forum

Subject: "Sql Server"

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Conferences Feature Requests Topic #168
Printer-friendly copy
Reading Topic #168, reply 23

MartinM

unregistered user

Mar-16-05, 11:24 AM (PDT)

23. "RE: Sql Server"
In response to message #19

I am happy to see the priority changed. I have been having numerous problems keeping my Exchange DB(Sawmill) up and running with SawMill. Our E2k log files are averaging around 500 Megs a day. Sawmill seems to be happy until we approach 7-10 days of logs then it start erroring out. SQL support should help elminate this problem.

Thanks

BTW: IT people seem to have much more free reign with MS-SQL implementation then choosing any other product. Personally, I can not choice IBM DB2 or Oracle on a window server without jumping through many flaming hoops. MS-SQL is very easy as there are really no guidelines set around deployment.

Alert | IP

Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Sql Server [View All], scottmss , 12:26 PM, Aug-09-04, (0)

RE: Sql Server, shimon , Aug-17-04, 00:38 AM, (1)
- RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Aug-27-04, 03:11 PM, (2)
  - RE: Sql Server, MartinM , Nov-02-04, 01:59 PM, (3)
    - RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Nov-02-04, 04:56 PM, (4)
    - RE: Sql Server, TRS , Dec-30-04, 09:49 AM, (5)
      - RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Dec-30-04, 10:54 AM, (6)
        
        RE: Sql Server, Peter Grande , Jan-17-05, 09:03 AM, (7)
        
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Jan-17-05, 08:17 PM, (8)
        
        RE: Sql Server, Craig , Jan-18-05, 04:04 AM, (9)
        
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Jan-19-05, 09:36 PM, (10)
        
        RE: Sql Server, azarc, Jan-20-05, 09:15 PM, (11)
        
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Jan-20-05, 10:06 PM, (12)
        
        RE: Sql Server, cpcman , Jan-23-05, 01:01 AM, (13)
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Jan-23-05, 10:31 PM, (14)
        RE: Sql Server, Rich D. , Jan-25-05, 12:35 PM, (15)
        RE: Sql Server, Rev , Jan-25-05, 08:03 PM, (16)
        RE: Sql Server, Tariq Rahman , Jan-26-05, 05:39 PM, (17)
        RE: Sql Server, Steve , Jan-26-05, 08:32 PM, (18)
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Jan-26-05, 09:44 PM, (19)
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Jan-27-05, 11:22 AM, (20)
        RE: Sql Server, MartinM , Mar-16-05, 11:24 AM, (23)
        RE: Sql Server, dgilmore, Mar-16-05, 02:18 PM, (24)
        RE: Sql Server, njudge, Jan-19-06, 03:23 PM, (30)
        RE: Sql Server, dgilmore, Jan-20-06, 05:04 PM, (32)
RE: Sql Server, pete , Feb-25-05, 02:43 AM, (21)
- RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Feb-25-05, 01:31 PM, (22)
  - RE: Sql Server, Dan Jones , Aug-02-05, 07:50 AM, (25)
    - RE: Sql Server, dgilmore, Aug-02-05, 11:58 AM, (26)
      - RE: Sql Server, F.Glanzmann , Sep-19-05, 06:39 AM, (27)
        
        RE: Sql Server, dgilmore, Sep-19-05, 09:40 AM, (28)
        
        RE: Sql Server, Jason Starkey , Jan-18-06, 01:43 PM, (29)
        
        RE: Sql Server, dgilmore, Jan-20-06, 05:02 PM, (31)
        
        RE: Sql Server, CPCMAN , Feb-12-06, 06:42 AM, (33)
        
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Feb-14-06, 09:57 PM, (34)
        
        RE: Sql Server, CPCMAN , Feb-16-06, 06:52 AM, (35)
        
        RE: Sql Server, ferrar, Feb-16-06, 05:53 PM, (36)

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic