|
Sawmill Discussion Forum
njudge
Member since Oct-26-05
6 posts |
Jan-19-06, 03:23 PM (PDT) |
  |
30. "RE: Sql Server"
In response to message #12
| |
I know you've already moved the priority up but I'll put my vote in for MSSQL anway.It'll let me run reports combining log data with our transactional stuff very easily and allow us to move the database onto our cluster which has a lot more power available.
|
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
 Sql Server [View All],
scottmss  , 12:26 PM, Aug-09-04, (0)
- RE: Sql Server,
shimon , Aug-17-04, 00:38 AM, (1)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar
 , Aug-27-04, 03:11 PM, (2)
- RE: Sql Server,
MartinM , Nov-02-04, 01:59 PM, (3)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Nov-02-04, 04:56 PM, (4)
- RE: Sql Server,
TRS , Dec-30-04, 09:49 AM, (5)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Dec-30-04, 10:54 AM, (6)
- RE: Sql Server,
Peter Grande , Jan-17-05, 09:03 AM, (7)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Jan-17-05, 08:17 PM, (8)
- RE: Sql Server,
Craig , Jan-18-05, 04:04 AM, (9)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Jan-19-05, 09:36 PM, (10)
- RE: Sql Server,
azarc, Jan-20-05, 09:15 PM, (11)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Jan-20-05, 10:06 PM, (12)
- RE: Sql Server,
cpcman , Jan-23-05, 01:01 AM, (13)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Jan-23-05, 10:31 PM, (14)
- RE: Sql Server,
Rich D. , Jan-25-05, 12:35 PM, (15)
- RE: Sql Server,
Rev , Jan-25-05, 08:03 PM, (16)
- RE: Sql Server,
Tariq Rahman , Jan-26-05, 05:39 PM, (17)
- RE: Sql Server,
Steve , Jan-26-05, 08:32 PM, (18)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Jan-26-05, 09:44 PM, (19)
- RE: Sql Server,
ferrar, Jan-27-05, 11:22 AM, (20)
- RE: Sql Server,
MartinM , Mar-16-05, 11:24 AM, (23)
- RE: Sql Server,
dgilmore, Mar-16-05, 02:18 PM, (24)
- RE: Sql Server,
njudge, Jan-19-06, 03:23 PM, (30)
- RE: Sql Server,
dgilmore, Jan-20-06, 05:04 PM, (32)
- RE: Sql Server,
pete , Feb-25-05, 02:43 AM, (21)
|
|
|
Printer-friendly copy
